tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569014705268253191.post1819424882967437926..comments2024-03-27T19:35:31.308-07:00Comments on Writers in London in the 1890s: Sherlock vs CreationismTine Hrenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07275522536093285024noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569014705268253191.post-10797578719366116552014-02-17T12:22:21.086-08:002014-02-17T12:22:21.086-08:00I still find that creationism and science to be in...I still find that creationism and science to be in conflict, while there has been much more progression there is still oppression of it. The 1890's was a time where things modern but still antiquated. Almost a whimsical time where these two forces met. One can never oppress science nor science religion.<br /><br />Essentially it would be the many questions that would be investigated and some in direct contrast to creationism. From the Enlightenment to present day these things persist. Yet without a Sherlock Holmes to investigate them, we would never know what truly happened. Creationism would hate him for challenging their beliefs, but without him, the truth can not be determined. They are a part of each other and oppressing science in that day or today does no justice. There is evidence for an against creationism, but even the bible supported medicine and use of natural cures. Suffice to say, Creationists would hate him when they would be proven wrong and love him when they are proven right. More hate than love though,,,Christopher Blessinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04562444825606611664noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569014705268253191.post-27460924103753155852014-02-17T10:27:05.760-08:002014-02-17T10:27:05.760-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Christopher Blessinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04562444825606611664noreply@blogger.com